We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Why Policy Goals Will Make 2026 a Breakout Year for IONQ, RGTI, QBTS
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
NQI funding growth and new 2025-2029 reauthorization plans set the stage for shifting quantum prospects.
RGTI and peers gain traction through DARPA picks, AFRL contracts and DOE-linked pilot efforts.
QBTS and other quantum firms see valuations shaped largely by government spending signals and contracts.
Since the original National Quantum Initiative (NQI) Act in 2018, quantum has been treated as a strategic technology alongside AI and advanced semiconductors. The FY 2025 NQI budget supplement shows federal agencies collectively investing about $1 billion a year in quantum information science, up from roughly $456 million in 2019, spread across Department of Energy (DOE), National Science Foundation (NSF), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Department of Defense (DOD) and the intelligence community.
The steady buildout has set the stage for the next wave of public-sector support, one that could reshape the trajectory of pure-play quantum companies heading into 2026.
Washington Raises the Stakes: NQI Reauthorization for 2025-2029
Reauthorization bills now moving through Congress will scale the program for 2025–2029. On the House side, H.R. 6213 will authorize about $1.8 billion over five years, funding new DOE QIS centers, NSF research and education hubs, NIST quantum labs and NASA experiments in space-based quantum applications. In the Senate, a competing Commerce Committee bill will go further, authorizing $2.7 billion over five years and explicitly pivoting the NQI toward applied projects, new NIST and NSF quantum centers, quantum testbeds and workforce hubs, and expanded public-private partnerships designed to push laboratory breakthroughs into real-world systems.
DARPA, AFRL and DOE
In April 2025, DARPA selected a group of companies, including pureplay quantum computing firms like IonQ (IONQ - Free Report) and Rigetti (RGTI - Free Report) , for a program to test the practicality of quantum computing. For IonQ, Rigetti and D-Wave, which continued to remain loss-making, such deals tied to DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative helped support their growth narrative. In September 2025, Rigetti announced a $5.8 million, three-year contract with the U.S. Air Force Research Lab for quantum networking, while IonQ signed an MOU with the Department of Energy on space-related quantum applications.
These are not massive amounts relative to big-tech R&D budgets, but in the context of sub-scale quantum companies, they matter. For many of these firms, a single defense award can represent a visible share of annual revenues and, more importantly, a strong signal that the government views their technology as strategically relevant.
Quantum Subsidies and Investor Expectations
On paper, companies like IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave (QBTS - Free Report) , and Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT - Free Report) remain in early stage with low revenues, sizable operating losses and technology still far from mainstream deployment. Yet, their valuations have expanded dramatically since the 2024 lows, and much of that premium reflects expectations about government spending rather than near-term enterprise demand.
When investors see a multi-year federal reauthorization bill, a new DOD or DOE pilot, or fresh quantum subsidies from the UK, EU or Japan, they are effectively inferring that the public sector will be the anchor customer for quantum through the 2030s. This is why a $5-10 million defense deal can move a stock as much as a full year of commercial bookings.
Trump's EUV Startup: A Template for State-backed Deep Tech
According to reports by The Wall Street Journal (first reported) and Reuters, the Trump administration has agreed to inject up to $150 million into xLight, a startup developing free-electron lasers that could power next-generation extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography for advanced chips. The investment is being channeled through the CHIPS R&D office and marks the first major move under a $7.4 billion research institute originally launched during tenure of the prior administration.
xLight’s goal is to build more efficient laser sources for EUV tools, a space currently dominated by ASML in the Netherlands, potentially reshaping the strategic bottleneck in high-end semiconductor manufacturing.
While xLight is not Trump’s startup in an ownership sense, the symbolism is clear. Washington is willing to take direct, equity-like stakes in deep-tech hardware companies tied to national security and supply-chain resilience. The line between subsidy and state venture capital is blurring.
If the U.S. government is prepared to own a slice of an EUV laser startup to secure chipmaking, it is not hard to imagine future programs that look more equity-like or even revenue-guaranteed for quantum hardware companies.
What This Means for Investors in 2026
For now, quantum stocks are still more story than cash flow. But the story is increasingly written on budget tables, grant calls and contract announcements, not just in lab breakthroughs.
From an analytical perspective, anyone modeling this space ahead of 2026 needs to treat policy and procurement as core inputs to valuation, not background noise. Tracking bills, defense solicitations and R&D partnerships are becoming crucial for investors in their decision-making.
YTD Price Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Valuation frameworks should focus on government procurement, not traditional product cycles. Companies like IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave and QUBT, all carrying a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) now, are likely to depend on multi-year federal contracts, milestone payments and access to government testbeds long before they generate meaningful commercial revenues.
Position Quantum as a Long-Term, Policy-Sensitive Bet
Quantum stocks should also be treated as small, long-term, policy-sensitive positions. The recent xLight example shows that Washington is willing to take equity-like stakes in critical hardware startups. That same playbook could eventually apply to quantum firms, especially those tied to defense or space projects.
The Bottom Line for 2026: Watch Policy Momentum
For 2026, the takeaway is straightforward: investors won’t succeed by guessing when quantum technology becomes mainstream. They will succeed by watching how aggressively governments choose to fund and support these companies — because policy momentum, not product launches, will drive quantum stocks.
Image: Bigstock
Why Policy Goals Will Make 2026 a Breakout Year for IONQ, RGTI, QBTS
Key Takeaways
Since the original National Quantum Initiative (NQI) Act in 2018, quantum has been treated as a strategic technology alongside AI and advanced semiconductors. The FY 2025 NQI budget supplement shows federal agencies collectively investing about $1 billion a year in quantum information science, up from roughly $456 million in 2019, spread across Department of Energy (DOE), National Science Foundation (NSF), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Department of Defense (DOD) and the intelligence community.
The steady buildout has set the stage for the next wave of public-sector support, one that could reshape the trajectory of pure-play quantum companies heading into 2026.
Washington Raises the Stakes: NQI Reauthorization for 2025-2029
Reauthorization bills now moving through Congress will scale the program for 2025–2029. On the House side, H.R. 6213 will authorize about $1.8 billion over five years, funding new DOE QIS centers, NSF research and education hubs, NIST quantum labs and NASA experiments in space-based quantum applications. In the Senate, a competing Commerce Committee bill will go further, authorizing $2.7 billion over five years and explicitly pivoting the NQI toward applied projects, new NIST and NSF quantum centers, quantum testbeds and workforce hubs, and expanded public-private partnerships designed to push laboratory breakthroughs into real-world systems.
DARPA, AFRL and DOE
In April 2025, DARPA selected a group of companies, including pureplay quantum computing firms like IonQ (IONQ - Free Report) and Rigetti (RGTI - Free Report) , for a program to test the practicality of quantum computing. For IonQ, Rigetti and D-Wave, which continued to remain loss-making, such deals tied to DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative helped support their growth narrative. In September 2025, Rigetti announced a $5.8 million, three-year contract with the U.S. Air Force Research Lab for quantum networking, while IonQ signed an MOU with the Department of Energy on space-related quantum applications.
These are not massive amounts relative to big-tech R&D budgets, but in the context of sub-scale quantum companies, they matter. For many of these firms, a single defense award can represent a visible share of annual revenues and, more importantly, a strong signal that the government views their technology as strategically relevant.
Quantum Subsidies and Investor Expectations
On paper, companies like IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave (QBTS - Free Report) , and Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT - Free Report) remain in early stage with low revenues, sizable operating losses and technology still far from mainstream deployment. Yet, their valuations have expanded dramatically since the 2024 lows, and much of that premium reflects expectations about government spending rather than near-term enterprise demand.
When investors see a multi-year federal reauthorization bill, a new DOD or DOE pilot, or fresh quantum subsidies from the UK, EU or Japan, they are effectively inferring that the public sector will be the anchor customer for quantum through the 2030s. This is why a $5-10 million defense deal can move a stock as much as a full year of commercial bookings.
Trump's EUV Startup: A Template for State-backed Deep Tech
According to reports by The Wall Street Journal (first reported) and Reuters, the Trump administration has agreed to inject up to $150 million into xLight, a startup developing free-electron lasers that could power next-generation extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography for advanced chips. The investment is being channeled through the CHIPS R&D office and marks the first major move under a $7.4 billion research institute originally launched during tenure of the prior administration.
xLight’s goal is to build more efficient laser sources for EUV tools, a space currently dominated by ASML in the Netherlands, potentially reshaping the strategic bottleneck in high-end semiconductor manufacturing.
While xLight is not Trump’s startup in an ownership sense, the symbolism is clear. Washington is willing to take direct, equity-like stakes in deep-tech hardware companies tied to national security and supply-chain resilience. The line between subsidy and state venture capital is blurring.
If the U.S. government is prepared to own a slice of an EUV laser startup to secure chipmaking, it is not hard to imagine future programs that look more equity-like or even revenue-guaranteed for quantum hardware companies.
What This Means for Investors in 2026
For now, quantum stocks are still more story than cash flow. But the story is increasingly written on budget tables, grant calls and contract announcements, not just in lab breakthroughs.
From an analytical perspective, anyone modeling this space ahead of 2026 needs to treat policy and procurement as core inputs to valuation, not background noise. Tracking bills, defense solicitations and R&D partnerships are becoming crucial for investors in their decision-making.
YTD Price Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Valuation frameworks should focus on government procurement, not traditional product cycles. Companies like IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave and QUBT, all carrying a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) now, are likely to depend on multi-year federal contracts, milestone payments and access to government testbeds long before they generate meaningful commercial revenues.
Position Quantum as a Long-Term, Policy-Sensitive Bet
Quantum stocks should also be treated as small, long-term, policy-sensitive positions. The recent xLight example shows that Washington is willing to take equity-like stakes in critical hardware startups. That same playbook could eventually apply to quantum firms, especially those tied to defense or space projects.
The Bottom Line for 2026: Watch Policy Momentum
For 2026, the takeaway is straightforward: investors won’t succeed by guessing when quantum technology becomes mainstream. They will succeed by watching how aggressively governments choose to fund and support these companies — because policy momentum, not product launches, will drive quantum stocks.
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.